Decopilot context compactification — parked design, resume after #3337

Status: Parked. Resume after #3337 (refactor(automations): use DBOS for scheduling and firing) merges.

That PR replaces the in-process cron worker, JetStream job queue, and semaphore with DBOS workflows. The Observer in this design is an async worker — riding DBOS rather than building parallel async infra is the right path.

The task-list / TodoWrite-style feature has been designed and shipped independently of this (see the matching todo_write spec/PR).

Goals (ranked)

• A. Threads never hit the model context ceiling. Hard requirement.
• D. Multi-day thread continuity. A user returning on day 14 finds the agent coherent.
• (Secondary) Token cost, lost-in-the-middle quality.

Current state of decopilot

• Memory loads the last 50 messages per turn (apps/mesh/src/api/routes/decopilot/memory.ts, DEFAULT_WINDOW_SIZE).
• Prompt assembly: system prompts + threadMessages + requestMessage → AI SDK convertToModelMessages → streamText (apps/mesh/src/api/routes/decopilot/stream-core.ts).
• No summarization, rollup, or token-aware truncation exists. A long thread will eventually break.
• Docs (apps/docs/.../decopilot/context.mdx) sketch a 6-slot context layout and a 40/80 rule, marked as intended-not-implemented.

Options surveyed

#	Name	Trigger	Authorship	Mutability	Cache-friendly	Provider-portable	UI-inspectable
1	Rolling Digest + Recent Window	threshold	system	rewritten	❌	✅	prose
2	Tiered Agentic Memory (MemGPT/Letta-style)	agent decides	agent via MCP tools	append + edit	⚠️	❌ varies by model	structured
3	Typed ProjectState + Event Log	threshold	extractor side-call	patched	⚠️	✅	structured
4	Asynchronous Observational Log (Mastra-style)	threshold	async observer	append-only + reflections	✅✅	✅	prose

Lineage: Claude Code /compact, Aider repo-map, SWE-agent observation elision, Anthropic memory tool + context editing, Letta/MemGPT (Packer 2023), CoALA (Sumers 2024), Reflexion (Shinn 2023), Mastra Observational Memory (2025), "Lost in the middle" (Liu 2024), recursive summarization (Wu 2021).

Selected design: hybrid 4 + 3

Per-thread durable artifacts:

1. Observational log — append-only markdown observations written by an async Observer (cheap model, e.g. Gemini Flash or Haiku). Triggered when unobserved-tokens > 30k. Sync fallback at 1.2× threshold to prevent overflow. When the log itself grows past ~40k tokens, a reflection pass compacts older observations into denser ones (two-level hierarchy).
2. Typed ProjectState sidecar — small Zod-schemaed snapshot extracted from observations during reflection. Approximate shape:

   {
     goals: string[];
     open_questions: string[];
     files: Record<string, { summary: string; last_seen_hash: string }>;
     blockers: string[];
   }
   

   ProjectState is queryable and human-inspectable in the UI. It is derived from observations, not authored independently — single source of truth.
3. Task list — decoupled from this design, model-managed via the todo_write tool (separate PR), per-thread, ephemeral, chat-UI-rendered.

Per-turn prompt assembly

Ordered stable → mutable for prompt-cache reuse:

1. system prompts          (cached)
2. ProjectState            (cached until next reflection)
3. Observations + reflections  (cached, append-only)
4. Open task list          (small mutable)
5. Last K raw turns        (K ≈ 10–20; was 50)
6. New user message

Anthropic prompt caching benefits 1–3 directly. Stages 4–6 are small.

Why hybrid over pure 4

• Pure observational log is prose. Goal D ("user returns on day 14") is partly a UX problem — the user wants to see what the agent remembers. A typed ProjectState panel makes that legible.
• Multi-provider via AI SDK means a typed sidecar survives model swaps mid-thread; a prose summary's style does not.
• Extracting ProjectState only during reflection (not every observation) keeps the extractor cost amortized.

Why async observer matters

• No latency tax on user turns. Compaction is invisible.
• Burst handling via sync fallback at 1.2× threshold preserves goal A.
• Decopilot's existing event bus + NATS notify could carry this — but the DBOS migration in #3337 changes the async substrate. Building on the post-PR primitives avoids rework.

Replaced/changed surface

• apps/mesh/src/api/routes/decopilot/memory.ts — loadHistory(50) → loadRecentMessages(K) + new loadObservations(threadId) + loadProjectState(threadId).
• apps/mesh/src/api/routes/decopilot/stream-core.ts — prompt assembly updated; emit "message-saved" events for the Observer.
• New migrations:
  • thread_observations(id, thread_id, kind 'observation'|'reflection', content, tokens_covered, created_at)
  • thread_project_state(thread_id PK, state_jsonb, updated_at)
• New DBOS workflow: observation-worker subscribed to message-saved events, debounced per thread, threshold-gated.
• New cheap-model provider configuration: which model the Observer uses (default Gemini 2.5 Flash, configurable per org).

Open questions to resolve on resume

• Exact thresholds (30k / 40k are Mastra defaults — validate against decopilot's typical thread shape).
• Tool-call output handling: SWE-agent-style elision of stale tool_result blocks (replace with <elided n_tokens=...> placeholders + path-keyed cache for file reads). How aggressive?
• Cross-thread memory: out of scope here, but worth a brief note on whether ProjectState should escape thread boundary later (e.g. per-project facts).
• Cost ceiling for the Observer (per-org rate limit?).
• Failure modes: Observer crashes → fall back to raw window + hard ceiling guard.

Out of scope

• Cross-thread / cross-project semantic memory (CoALA semantic tier).
• Vector retrieval over archived turns (could be a later phase).
• User-editable observations or ProjectState (Observer is authoritative).
• The task-list / todo_write feature (separate PR).

Resume checklist

When #3337 lands:

1. Read the merged DBOS workflow API and update the Observer worker design.
2. Validate thresholds against real thread data (SELECT thread_id, SUM(tokens) FROM thread_messages GROUP BY thread_id).
3. Spec the cheap-model provider plumbing (org-level config, fallback chain).
4. Resume brainstorming → writing-plans flow.

When #3337 merges, read the DBOS workflow API and revisit apps/mesh/src/api/routes/decopilot/memory.ts and stream-core.ts. Validate the 30k/40k thresholds with the listed thread_messages query, then resolve provider, tool-result, and failure-mode questions before writing the plan. Done means the post-DBOS design is specified for observations, ProjectState, prompt assembly, and the observation worker.