decentralized-identity / decentralized-identity/did-methods
DID Methods that serve the needs of a particular company or government should be given _less priority_ that DID Methods that address a broad range of organizations...
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 21
- Forks
- 20
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
DID Methods that serve the needs of a particular company or government should be given _lower priority_ that DID Methods that address a broad range of organiations, entity types, and applications.
In effect, we're talking about what is the _overall DIF business case_ for each particular DID Method.
Examples include (from a business case perspective):
- https://github.com/decentralized-identity/did-methods/issues/14#issue-2699116880
- https://github.com/decentralized-identity/did-methods/issues/14#issuecomment-2504391504
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reviewing issue #14 and the linked examples to understand the proposed business-case comparison for DID Methods. Done would require an agreed, documented prioritization approach that distinguishes methods serving broad organizations, entity types, and applications from narrowly targeted methods.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100