decentralized-identity / decentralized-identity/did-methods
Operating Addendum: Evaluation Criteria
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 21
- Forks
- 20
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
> - [Operating Addendum](https://github.com/decentralized-identity/org/blob/main/Org%20documents/WG%20documents/DIF_DID_Methods_Operating_Addendum_v1.pdf)
@kimdhamilton If I understand the purpose of the Evaluation Criteria section correctly, this is where I'd like to include the DID Method Clusters Taxonomy Model you and I discussed.
**References**
- https://github.com/decentralized-identity/did-methods/issues/14
- https://hyperonomy.com/2024/11/11/catergories-of-decentralized-identifiers-dids/
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the linked Operating Addendum PDF, focusing on its Evaluation Criteria section, then review did-methods issue #14 and the referenced taxonomy article. Clarify with the working group whether the DID Method Clusters Taxonomy Model belongs there and what form it should take. Done means the agreed taxonomy is incorporated into the addendum.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100