DuckDB bugbash: `table_function` materialization parity
Open
adapter:duckdb
area:adapters
engine:v2
status:has-repro
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 13.8k
- Forks
- 2.6k
- Avg merge
- 21h 31m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 56
Description
## Goal
Compare dbt Core `dbt-duckdb` vs dbt Fusion DuckDB behavior for `table_function` materialization.
## Experiment
Create a minimal documented-style `table_function` example and compare compile/run behavior between engines.
## Why this matters
This is a powerful DuckDB-specific adapter feature that could expose parity gaps.
## Success criteria
- Equivalent table-function materialization works in both engines, or
- a minimal repro isolates the Fusion gap
## Notes
Exclude static-analysis / `SQL_understanding` concerns from scope.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.