davidsonfellipe / davidsonfellipe/awesome-wpo
Would a reproducible infinite-scroll benchmark fit Awesome WPO?
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 9.1k
- Forks
- 591
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi — I maintain FrontendAtlas, an independent frontend interview-prep project.
I’m preparing a public, no-sign-up benchmark that compares unbounded DOM append, `content-visibility: auto`, and windowed virtualization at 1,000, 10,000, and 50,000 variable-height rows. The planned package includes raw samples, JSON/CSV downloads, an accessible chart, a fixed-seed fixture and runner, and separate data/code licenses.
Before opening a pull request, would this kind of reproducible evidence fit the Benchmarks section (or another section you prefer) once the public URL and final measurements are live and independently verifiable?
I maintain the proposed resource. It is not published yet, so I’m not asking you to review or add a link now. No paid, affiliate, sponsored, or particular `rel` placement is being requested. If this is not the right use of issues, please close it and I won’t follow up here.
Disclosure: this note was drafted with AI assistance and reviewed before posting.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.