Add Go package-level doc comments to src/backend/providers/
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 432
- Forks
- 51
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
The provider files under src/backend/providers/ all start with a bare package providers line. Go convention (and many linters such as revive/golint) want a // Package providers ... doc comment on at least one file, plus a short doc comment on each exported type/function.
Files missing package or top-of-file doc comments:
src/backend/providers/provider.gosrc/backend/providers/openai.gosrc/backend/providers/anthropic.gosrc/backend/providers/gemini.gosrc/backend/providers/mistral.gosrc/backend/providers/custom.go
What to do
- Add a single `// Package providers ...` comment at the top of
provider.godescribing what the package does (LLM provider adapters: request/response shape per provider, masking integration). - For each provider file, add a one-line comment above the file header (e.g.
// File openai.go contains the OpenAI provider adapter.). - Add short
// FunctionName ...doc comments to exported types and functions that currently lack them.
Hints
- Run
make checkorgolangci-lint runbefore/after to confirm no new warnings. - Keep comments short — one sentence is enough.
Difficulty: good first issue, ~1 hour.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with src/backend/providers/provider.go and review the listed provider files: openai.go, anthropic.go, gemini.go, mistral.go, and custom.go. Add the package, file, and missing exported type/function comments described in the issue. Run make check or golangci-lint run and confirm the documentation warnings are resolved.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 84/100