Feature Request: sklearn.utils.estimator_checks, but with Dask collections

## Feature Request

For any checks in `sklearn.utils.estimator_checks` that generate `pandas` DataFrames, `scipy` sparse arrays, or `numpy` arrays, implement equivalent checks in `dask-ml`, but which generate small Dask collections.

## How this might improve `dask-ml`

Adding this feature might be one piece of providing a standardized path for writing scikit-learn compatible estimators that use Dask and take in data as Dask collections, like a Dask equivalent to ["Developing scikit-learn estimators"](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/developers/develop.html). This might give projects like `xgboost`, `lightgbm`, `cuml`, and others a target to hit and encourage a greater degree of consistency between them.

## Background

`scikit-learn` encourages the development of estimators that follow a specific API. This specification is described in detail in ["Developing scikit-learn estimators"](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/developers/develop.html).

To help projects that maintain `scikit-learn`-compatible detect incompatibilities with different `scikit-learn` versions, the project supports a collection of checks that can be run in unit tests. These are in the submodule `sklearn.utils.estimator_checks`: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/31b34b560de57a049dd435dccc55112271322370/sklearn/utils/estimator_checks.py#L2194.

You can see `LightGBM`'s unit tests for an example of how a project might use things from `sklearn.utils.estimator_checks`. https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/blob/eda1effb52b38cbad8f9cf7c28952f1077fc3c76/tests/python_package_test/test_sklearn.py#L1150-L1193

Unfortunately, many of these tests cannot be run for the scikit-learn-compatible estimators in `xgboost.dask` and `lightgbm.dask` (and their predecessors, `dask-xgboost` and `dask-lightgbm`). Many of those checks generate small test numpy arrays for training or validation data. Since `xgboost.dask` and `lightgbm.dask` scikit-learn estimators only accept data in Dask collections, it's not possible to use a pattern like this:

```python
def _tested_estimators():
for Estimator in [lgb.DaskLGBMClassifier, lgb.DaskLGBMRegressor]:
yield Estimator()

@parametrize_with_checks(list(_tested_estimators()))
def test_sklearn_integration(estimator, check, request):
estimator.set_params(min_child_samples=1, min_data_in_bin=1)
check(estimator)
```

Because most of the tests will fail with errors like the following (this one is from LightGBM, but `xgboost.dask` has similar behavior).

> E TypeError: Data must be either Dask Array or Dask DataFrame. Got .

## Notes for Reviewers

Sorry this is so open-ended. If there's anything I can do to make the request more specific or clearer, please let me know.

If there is interest in this, I'd be happy to help contribute piece of it!

Thanks for your time and consideration.