dask / dask/dask-ml

Do we care about k-fold cross validation for large datasets?

Open
#303 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
951
Forks
262
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

When considering incremental models how much do we care about k-fold cross validation? My understanding is that the k-fold bit is an effort to train on all of our data, while still protecting testing data for each fold. I wonder how often using all of the data is a requirement in the cases where `Incremental` will be used. My guess would be that this becomes less important.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

The issue is an open design question about k-fold cross-validation for incremental models and large datasets. No files, tests, entry points, or acceptance criteria are named; first establish whether this support is needed and agree on the scope and success criteria before implementation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
machine-learning
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.