Should inline class members with same names as those of the field be targets of lint?

For the same reason of prohibiting to override `toString()`, it is very confusing.

```dart
inline class Id {
final int value;
Id(this.value);
bool get isEven => value.isOdd; // lying. Should this be a target of lint?
}

main() {
Id id = Id(123);
print(id.isEven); // true (deceived)
dynamic d = id;
print(d.isEven); // false
}
```

Start with the inline class Id example in the issue and reproduce the differing isEven results for static and dynamic access. Determine whether this naming pattern should be covered by a lint, then document the intended rule and its expected diagnostic behavior; no implementation files or tests are identified in the issue.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.