Are GitHub Issues or the RT Queue the canonical place for issues
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Perl
- Stars
- 37
- Forks
- 54
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I noticed that the repo has an Issues section, but the RT Queue has bugs and is what MetaCPAN links to.
Perhaps import issues from one to the other and disable the non-canonical one?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by comparing the repository's GitHub Issues section with the RT Queue, including the queue linked by MetaCPAN. Determine which system should be canonical and document the required import, migration, or disabling work; done means the project has one agreed issue location and a clear transition plan.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- perl
- Domain
- developer-experience
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100