danielmiessler / danielmiessler/Telos

How the schema of a TCF was conceived

Open
#5 2 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
1.5k
Forks
226
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

I find the project quite interesting and brilliant, but I think it would be interesting, at least to me, know you come out with the current schema of the TCF.
I would really like to know the process that brought to define the chain Problems -> Mission -> (Narratives) -> Goals -> Challenges -> Strategies —> Projects -> Journal. How did you find this chain? Was it empirical? Was it based on researches about human beings?
In addition, how do you test it? How do you know that the schema is a good one and you are not missing something?
Thank you in advance

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start by reviewing the TCF schema and the Problems -> Mission -> (Narratives) -> Goals -> Challenges -> Strategies -> Projects -> Journal chain described in the issue. Clarify the historical or research basis for the schema and how it is evaluated, then document the rationale and testing approach in a contributor-facing location identified by the maintainers.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.