eBraille 1.0 spec - Examples 19 & 20 are confusing
Open
eBraille specification
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 27
- Forks
- 7
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Should Example 19 say “A single braille code” only? Also, is Example 19 necessary and/or valid given that all code-specific information SHOULD be provided? In this same section, can we consider “bar by bar” (or any other music-related transcription format) a code-specific term? Though much needed, is this the right place to include this information?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.