Give consistent naming for sized/machine numeric types
Open
enhancement
question
- Dominant language
- Haskell
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Do we need separate C FFI types (like CInt) etc for everything, or can we get away with a few important ones. Can we assume stable architectures everywhere and be mean?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.