[Feature Request] Support ShadowTLS (for shadowsocks)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 6.2k
- Forks
- 404
- Avg merge
- 57m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
Greetings
No response
Feature Request
Support ShadowTLS (may be as a Shadowsocks plugin)
https://github.com/ihciah/shadow-tls?tab=readme-ov-file#how-it-works
Use Cases
Better disguise when using shadowsocks.
Potential Benefits
Defending against traffic signature detection, active detection and traffic hijacking.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the linked ShadowTLS “how it works” documentation and searching the repository for its Shadowsocks integration; the issue names no files, entry points, or tests. Establish the compatibility boundary and validation needed for ShadowTLS support, including whether it should be exposed as a Shadowsocks plugin.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- networking
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100