dabl / dabl/dabl

outlier heuristic doesn't work well for ordinal data

Open
#267 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
bug
Dominant language
Jupyter Notebook
Stars
726
Forks
103
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

0 173980
1 70360
2 35010
3 14060
4 6160
5 2160
6 790
7 180
8 30

yields 10 outliers?!

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by reproducing the shown ordinal-value case and locating the outlier heuristic that marks all ten values; determine the intended behavior for ordinal data and verify the corrected result with a regression case.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
data
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.