cxw42 / cxw42/git-find

Use Type::Tiny for the individual tests/actions?

Open
#14 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
enhancement
Dominant language
Perl
Stars
4
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

This is a speculative one. I don't know if this would be a good idea. However, I am intrigued by the idea of being able to use Type::Tiny's inlining system.

Ref: https://metacpan.org/pod/Type::Tiny

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points; begin by reviewing the repository's individual tests and actions alongside the Type::Tiny documentation. Determine whether Type::Tiny's inlining system fits those components, then define a concrete scope and acceptance criteria before implementation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
git, perl
Domain
cli, search, tooling
Issue type
Refactor
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.