Overt emphasis on file length in thermonuclear code review.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 8.2k
- Forks
- 751
- Avg merge
- 12h 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 43
Description
Although your thermodermicular code review does seem decent, clearly the engineer who wrote it had strong opinions regarding file length. A thousand line file was a completely reasonable limit in the olden days. However, now that we're using agents to manage skill, logical grouping matters more than individual file readability.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating the code-review guidance that imposes the file-length emphasis, then determine how logical grouping should be evaluated instead. Done means the review no longer treats a thousand-line limit as the primary concern, with focused checks covering the revised behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100