Forensic: Missing writeups.
- Dominant language
- CSS
- Stars
- 2k
- Forks
- 710
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
There exist no (known) write-ups for these Forensic challenges:
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/polictf-2015/forensics/lost-a-file
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/csaw-finals-ctf-2015/forensic/phish-it-phish-it-good
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/whitehat-grand-prix-qualification-2015/forensics/son-doong
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/uiuctf-2015/forensics/the-gibson
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/polictf-2015/forensics/fragmented-key
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/hackover-ctf-2015/forensics/meargot
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/th3jackers-ctf-2015/forensics/for200
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/asis-quals-ctf-2015/forensic/must-see-iran
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/hackover-ctf-2015/forensics/alienmessage
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/asis-quals-ctf-2015/forensic/checkme
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/asis-finals-ctf-2015/forensic/iosdump
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/break-in-ctf-2015/forensic/valentines_day
- [x] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/icectf-2015/forensics/alien-contact
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/break-in-ctf-2015/forensic/cheaters
- [ ] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/break-in-ctf-2015/forensic/investigator
- [x] https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2015/tree/master/32c3-ctf-2015/forensics/the-300
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by opening the unchecked challenge directories linked in the issue and compare nearby existing forensic write-ups for the repository’s expected format. Research and document each listed challenge, then verify every completed entry and update its checklist marker; the two already checked entries are reference points rather than remaining work.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100