cryostatio / cryostatio/cryostat-operator
[Story] Scorecard test for built-in discovery
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 37
- Forks
- 22
- Avg merge
- 21h 37m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 22
Description
We should revisit adding a Scorecard test similar to `cryostat-recording` that uses built-in Kubernetes discovery instead of a custom target. We encountered some strange networking failures on the Cryostat end when trying this previously: https://github.com/cryostatio/cryostat-operator/pull/698#issuecomment-1885829894. Nevertheless, this is an important test to have so we should try to find some way to make it work, at least for 3.0+.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reviewing the existing `cryostat-recording` Scorecard test and the networking failures discussed in pull request 698's linked comment. Compare that test with the requested built-in Kubernetes discovery path and verify the result against the Scorecard test setup. Done means a reliable test works for the intended 3.0+ versions without the previously encountered Cryostat-side networking failures.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go, kubernetes
- Domain
- observability, testing
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 28/100