cryostatio / cryostatio/cryostat-operator

[Story] Scorecard test for built-in discovery

Open
#789 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
test
Dominant language
Go
Stars
37
Forks
22
Avg merge
21h 37m
Merged PRs (30d)
22

Description

We should revisit adding a Scorecard test similar to `cryostat-recording` that uses built-in Kubernetes discovery instead of a custom target. We encountered some strange networking failures on the Cryostat end when trying this previously: https://github.com/cryostatio/cryostat-operator/pull/698#issuecomment-1885829894. Nevertheless, this is an important test to have so we should try to find some way to make it work, at least for 3.0+.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start by reviewing the existing `cryostat-recording` Scorecard test and the networking failures discussed in pull request 698's linked comment. Compare that test with the requested built-in Kubernetes discovery path and verify the result against the Scorecard test setup. Done means a reliable test works for the intended 3.0+ versions without the previously encountered Cryostat-side networking failures.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
go, kubernetes
Domain
observability, testing
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
28/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.