crewAIInc / crewAIInc/crewAI

[FEATURE] Document EmpirioLabs in the LLM provider configuration examples

Open Beginner friendly
#7,551 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

vendor-pitch
Dominant language
Python
Stars
58.8k
Forks
8.5k
Avg merge
1d 15h
Merged PRs (30d)
109

Description

Feature Area

Documentation

Is your feature request related to a an existing bug? Please link it here.

NA

Describe the solution you'd like

docs/en/concepts/llms.mdx lists Provider Configuration Examples for the LiteLLM-backed providers, and EmpirioLabs is missing from that list even though it is a registered LiteLLM provider, so LLM(model="empiriolabs/<model>") already routes through the standard LiteLLM fallback path in crewai.llm with no code change.

The ask is one more accordion in that section, matching the existing Nebius AI Studio and SambaNova entries: the env var, an LLM(model=...) example, short feature notes, and the LiteLLM dependency note. English docs only.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Leaving it out and letting users work it out from the generic LiteLLM instructions. That works, but every other provider in the same position has an entry, so the omission just makes a supported provider look unsupported.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start in docs/en/concepts/llms.mdx and read the existing Nebius AI Studio and SambaNova provider configuration accordions. Add a matching EmpirioLabs entry with its environment variable, an LLM(model=...) example, short feature notes, and the LiteLLM dependency note. Done means the English documentation lists EmpirioLabs consistently with the other LiteLLM-backed providers.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
1/5
Estimated time
Under an hour
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
92/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.