creativecommons / creativecommons/cc-signals
Open clause is too loose
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 132
- Forks
- 27
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
## Description
The “Open” clause is too loose. The proposed openness models are not equivalent and do not enjoy consensus within the community. It does not meet the need to require genuine reciprocity in terms of openness with a viral effect. The inability to specify the chosen level of openness is problematic.
## Expectation
The entire logic of voluntary licenses is to be able to clearly and deliberately specify the permitted uses. The user must be able to precisely define the level of openness — or restriction — they want for the model.
Contributor guide
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named, so begin by locating the definition of the “Open” clause in the project. Done means the clause lets users deliberately specify a precise openness or restriction level and addresses the requested reciprocity with a viral effect.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- ai
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100