Review gist of CrateDB adapter
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi there,
we just talked about TSPERF again, because both TSBS and RockBench will no longer be maintained going forward, so TSPERF could be considered as a good alternative.
Can I humbly ask you to evaluate and/or confirm this is the optimal / most-performant way to insert data into CrateDB?
https://github.com/crate/tsperf/blob/666ddfe3a29607231c613b0b523be8dce053ec7e/tsperf/adapter/cratedb.py#L66-L79
With kind regards,
Andreas.
/cc @WalBeh, @proddata, @hammerhead, @hlcianfagna
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with tsperf/adapter/cratedb.py at lines 66-79 and inspect how the CrateDB adapter inserts data. Compare that approach with the benchmark's needs and document whether it is optimal or identify what should change. Done means the insertion strategy has a clear, evidence-based assessment.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- databases, performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100