crate / crate/tsperf

Review gist of CrateDB adapter

Open
#63 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
5
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Hi there,

we just talked about TSPERF again, because both TSBS and RockBench will no longer be maintained going forward, so TSPERF could be considered as a good alternative.

Can I humbly ask you to evaluate and/or confirm this is the optimal / most-performant way to insert data into CrateDB?

https://github.com/crate/tsperf/blob/666ddfe3a29607231c613b0b523be8dce053ec7e/tsperf/adapter/cratedb.py#L66-L79

With kind regards,
Andreas.

/cc @WalBeh, @proddata, @hammerhead, @hlcianfagna

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start with tsperf/adapter/cratedb.py at lines 66-79 and inspect how the CrateDB adapter inserts data. Compare that approach with the benchmark's needs and document whether it is optimal or identify what should change. Done means the insertion strategy has a clear, evidence-based assessment.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
databases, performance
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.