Reconsider link-libraries
Open
bug
help wanted
scheduled
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 191
- Forks
- 14
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Following up from [discussion in slack](https://cpplang.slack.com/messages/C05KA1B6PNX/p1710541202610949?thread_ts=1710535467.028959). We agree that supporting link search paths and short names, ie `-L/usr/lib -lfoo` is more error prone than just supporting linking full paths, ie `-l/usr/lib/libfoo.so`. As a result we should probably drop the attribute link-libraries from the spec.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.