[expr.call]/1 Lacking `defnx` for "function call"
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
[expr.call]/1 seems to be the only place defining what is a "function call":
A function call is a postfix expression followed by parentheses containing a possibly empty, comma-separated list of initializer-clauses which constitute the arguments to the function.
The Index already includes "recursive function call" and "undefined function call". Lacking for the "function call" itself reveals imcompleteness.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the [expr.call]/1 wording and inspect the existing Index entries for “recursive function call” and “undefined function call” to find how these entries are represented in the draft sources. Add the missing “function call” index entry using the repository’s existing convention, then verify that the generated index includes it.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 72/100