[expr.prim.lambda.capture] bullet (10.2) "capture (noun)" is undefined, possibly *capture* the non-terminal instead
Open
Beginner friendly
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
[expr.prim.lambda.capture] bullet (10.2) says
it is explicitly captured with a capture that is not of the form ...
There is only a definition for "capture (verb)" in [expr.prim.lambda.capture]/8.
Here it should be "capture" referring to the grammatical non-terminal.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at [expr.prim.lambda.capture] bullet (10.2) in the linked C++ draft and compare its use of “capture” with the definition in [expr.prim.lambda.capture]/8. Done means the undefined noun usage is corrected to refer to the grammatical non-terminal and the draft wording is internally consistent.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 88/100