[const.wrap.class] The deleted `operator,` overload has meaningless `constexpr` and `noexcept`
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
P3-Other
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
They don't seem to make sense for a deleted overload. Perhaps it's better to remove them (after merging the PR for P3978R3).
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Locate the const.wrap.class wording in the draft and review the changes from P3978R3 before editing. Remove the meaningless constexpr and noexcept from the deleted operator, then verify the wording remains correct after that change is merged.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp, tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100