[basic.life] Does implicit object creation reuse storage?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
cwg
not-editorial
P3-Other
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
Implicit object creation behaves somehow like placement new-expression (see CWG2533). So it seems to me that implicit object creation can also reuse storage.
However, we haven't mentioned this in [basic.life]. Do we need some clarification? Should we clarify this editorially?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the [basic.life] wording and CWG2533, then examine how implicit object creation is described relative to placement new-expressions. Done means reaching a decision on whether clarification is needed and recording the resulting standards-draft wording if it is.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100