[mdspan.sub.helpers] doesn't say the exposition-only helpers are exposition-only
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
Similarly for [mdspan.extents.expo] and maybe others. The title of the subclause is "Exposition-only helpers" but I don't think titles are normative, so we should start the subclause with something like "the following exposition-only funtions are used ..."
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Inspect the [mdspan.sub.helpers] and [mdspan.extents.expo] subclauses in the draft, starting with their headings and opening text. Check whether the prose explicitly identifies the functions as exposition-only, and review similar subclauses for the same omission. Done means the affected subclauses state that status normatively and consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 64/100