[ranges] Consider specifying all `<ranges>`-wide exposition-only helpers in one section
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
P3-Other
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
Currently they are specified in multiple sections, which possibly complicates cross-referencing. It seems better to concentratedly specify them.
Moreover, IOTA-DIFF-T is specified in a seemingly weird way. Perhaps this should also be improved together.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the sections that specify the ranges-wide exposition-only helpers and the specification of IOTA-DIFF-T in the draft. Compare their cross-references before deciding how to consolidate them; done means the helpers are specified together and the resulting references remain coherent.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp, tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100