[intro.compliance.general], [using.headers] Redundant and inconsistent wording

[intro.compliance.general] paragraph 5:

A C++ translation unit ([lex.phases]) obtains access to the names defined in the library by including the appropriate standard library header or importing the appropriate standard library named header unit ([using.headers]).

[using.headers] paragraph 1:

The entities in the C++ standard library are defined in headers, whose contents are made available to a translation unit when it contains the appropriate #include preprocessing directive ([cpp.include]) or the appropriate import declaration ([module.import]).

Problems

I think the intent here is that [intro.compliance] acts as a forward reference which lists possible ways to get standard library names, but it fails to mention import std ([std.modules]), so it is incomplete.

It is also weird that [intro.compliance] specifically mentions named header units, but [using.headers], which it references, keeps it somewhat vague with "appropriate import declaration". You would think that the [library] wording would contain more detailed wording, not less detailed.

Suggested solution

If we are keeping the paragraph in [intro.compliance], it should additionally mention [std.modules]. Furthermore,the wording in [using.headers] should mention "named header units" instead of "appropriate import declaration", which is needlessly vague.

Start with the linked [intro.compliance.general] paragraph 5 and [using.headers] paragraph 1, then read the referenced [std.modules] wording. Update the draft wording to mention std modules and named header units consistently, and verify that the cross-references remain accurate.