[basic.indet] Reproducibility of erroneous byte values
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
[basic.indet]/1.2 seems a bit too terse to read. Does the paragraph require that each erroneous byte value is reproducible at each time the execution point is reached (possibly even among different executions)?
Can we add an example to clarify that which implementation strategies are allowed and which are not?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read [basic.indet]/1.2 in the linked C++ draft and review the existing discussion about whether erroneous byte values must be reproducible. Locate the draft source for this paragraph, then add an example that clarifies which implementation strategies are allowed and which are not; done means the intended interpretation is explicit.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp, tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100