Reword "possible to be well-defined only if" wording in "sized ranges" notes
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
P3-Other
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
Note that this sentence is modeled (!) on existing wording https://eel.is/c++draft/range.sized#note-1 - so any perceived defect here exists elsewhere already.
Originally posted by @cor3ntin in https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/pull/7698#discussion_r1965456139
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the “sized ranges” note referenced by the issue and compare its wording with the existing wording at https://eel.is/c++draft/range.sized#note-1. Determine a clearer replacement for the phrase “possible to be well-defined only if”; the work is done when that note’s wording is rephrased consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp, tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100