"valarray<complex>"
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
[numeric.requirements]:
[Example 1 : It is valid to instantiate
valarray<complex>, butoperator>()will not be successfully instantiated for
valarray<complex>operands, sincecomplexdoes not have any ordering operators. — end example]
What is valarray<complex>? What is complex?
Referring to operator>() with parentheses is wrong too, there's no such function signature, and that's not a valid function call expression.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Search the draft source for the [numeric.requirements] section and the quoted valarray example. Check the surrounding terminology and the reference to operator>(). Done means revising the example so valarray and complex are identified clearly and the operator reference does not imply a nonexistent function signature.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp, tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100