[range.adaptor.object][exec.adapt.obj] Consider specifying piping only once
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
P3-Other
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
These two sections are quite similar. I think it would be better to specify the piping mechanism once somewhere to avoid duplication and potential missing of synchronization.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Locate the [range.adaptor.object] and [exec.adapt.obj] sections in the draft source and compare how each specifies the piping mechanism and synchronization. Determine whether the shared wording can be specified once without losing requirements, then verify both sections in the rendered draft.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100