[std.manip, ext.manip] Better titles for "Standard"/"Extended" manipulators
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
P3-Other
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
It seems a bit misleading that the standard distinguishes some manipulators with words "standard" and "extended", as all of these manipulators are standard library components.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Locate the [std.manip] and [ext.manip] sections in the draft and review their current titles and surrounding terminology. Propose clearer titles that avoid implying that only some manipulators are standard library components, then verify both section headings are updated consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100