[lex] `\indextext{separate translation|see{compilation, separate}}` ?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
P3-Other
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
Is this indexed as intended? I find it strange that all these entries would redirect to compilation, separate.
Shouldn't it be the other way around? Do we even want to mention compilation here? After all, compilation isn't really the conventional wording we use here.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with source/lex.tex lines 7-9 and inspect the indextext entry and its generated redirection. Check how nearby entries use compilation terminology and compare the resulting index wording with the conventions in the draft. Done means the entry direction and terminology are agreed and the source reflects that decision.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100