[mdspan.accessor.reqmts] Name type `A` to `ACC`?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
P3-Other
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
The use of A in [mdspan.accessor.reqmts] refers to types that meet accessor policy requirements, which makes it similar to "A" of "A type" and seems to reduce the comfort of reading.
Is it worth renaming A to ACC or is it just wishful thinking on my part?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked [[mdspan.accessor.reqmts]] section and inspect how A is used for accessor policy requirement types. Determine whether renaming it to ACC improves readability and identify all affected references; the work is done when the naming decision and any required editorial changes are agreed and applied consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100