cplusplus / cplusplus/draft

[basic.scope.block] et al. - Ambiguous definition of "local variable"

Open
#6,617 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
TeX
Stars
221
Forks
813
Avg merge
16h 4m
Merged PRs (30d)
36

Description

In recent drafts for [basic.scope.block], the term for a variable belonging to a block scope has changed from local variable to block variable. However, subsequent mentions of a local variable have not been changed, leading to an ambiguous meaning.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the [basic.scope.block] section and inspect subsequent mentions of “local variable” and “block variable” in the draft. Confirm that the terminology consistently identifies variables belonging to block scope and that no ambiguous references remain; no specific file or test is named in the issue.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
cpp, tex
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.