[class.conv.fct] Can p8 be a note?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
P3-Other
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
A conversion function is a non-static member function, so the default assumption is that it can be virtual. Is it important for this paragraph to be normative, or can it be a note?
If it was a note, should it include the index entry?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read source/classes.tex at lines 2585-2587 and review the surrounding wording about conversion functions. Determine whether paragraph 8 should remain normative or become a note, and whether the index entry is still needed; done means the editorial decision and resulting wording are recorded.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100