[basic.scope] What is type equivalence?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
[basic.scope] p3 refers to same types in one definition, and equivalent types in another.
When are two types considered equivalent, and what is the difference between that and them being the same type? There should be a forward-reference to the relevant section, and I was unable to find it.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the [basic.scope] p3 section linked in the issue and trace its references to the definitions of type equivalence and same types. Compare the terminology and identify the relevant section for a forward-reference; done means the distinction is supported by the draft and the reference is added to the wording.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100