`badbit` not properly qualified as `ios_base::badbit`
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
P2-Bug
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
I wonder why we just say `badbit` here not `ios_base::badbit`. It's pre-existing though.
See https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/pull/5991#discussion_r1044421297 and https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/pull/5991#discussion_r1044431915.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the two discussion links from pull request 5991, then search the draft sources for the unqualified badbit occurrence. Done means the affected reference uses ios_base::badbit consistently and the relevant document output remains correct.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100