[std] Revise uses of undefined term "potentially throwing"
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
There's 3 occurrences:
compatibility.tex:if it has a potentially throwing dynamic exception specification,
concepts.tex:concept forbids destructors that are potentially throwing, even if a particular
exceptions.tex:the declaration has a potentially throwing exception specification
Presumably, all 3 should be "potentially-throwing" instead.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Open compatibility.tex, concepts.tex, and exceptions.tex and locate the three quoted occurrences of “potentially throwing.” Update the terminology consistently to “potentially-throwing,” then review the diff to confirm all three named passages changed and no unrelated text was modified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100