[class.copy.assign] lacks to specify the effect of the implicitly-defined move assignment operator for a union class
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
[class.copy.assign] p13 only specifies the effect of the implicitly-defined copy assignment operator for a union class.
The implicitly-defined copy assignment operator for a union X copies the object representation ([basic.types]) of X.
we lack to specify the relevant expound about the effect of the implicitly-defined move assignment operator for a union class. Presumably, that effect is equivalent to that of the above? which maybe that
The implicitly-defined copy /move assignment operator for a union X copies the object representation ([basic.types]) of X.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Search the draft sources for [class.copy.assign] paragraph 13 and read the surrounding copy and move assignment wording. Confirm whether the effect of an implicitly-defined move assignment operator for a union is specified; done means the clause states the intended effect unambiguously and the generated draft reflects the accepted wording.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp, tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100