[intro.execution] A full-expression is: an invocation of a destructor generated at the end of the lifetime
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
cwg
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
This is unclear. The lifetime ends when a destructor's call start, not the other way around, but this is just a wording bug. It is not specified when such invocations are generated.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the [intro.execution] wording discussed in the issue and compare how it describes destructor invocation and object lifetime. Done means the draft clearly specifies when these invocations are generated and no longer reverses the relationship between lifetime end and destructor-call start.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100