Cross-reference [class.mem]/14 from [class.virtual]/5 and [class.virtual]/4
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
See https://lists.isocpp.org/core/2020/05/8903.php. To alleviate such confusion, it seems like an idea to me to xref the part where virt-specifiers are restricted to virtual functions from the description of their semantics, because those two things are some distance apart.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Locate the draft source for [class.virtual]/4 and /5, then compare it with [class.mem]/14 and the surrounding cross-reference style. Add the requested cross-reference from the virt-specifiers semantics to their restriction on virtual functions, and verify that the generated C++ draft renders the links correctly.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp, tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100