ADL for cv T or T& CWG2888
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
cwg
not-editorial
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
[basic.lookup.argdep] never considers that T might be cv-qualified; now that [concept.booleantestable]/2.2 sends decltype((e)) to "ADL", it might also be a reference type. The intent here is obviously to ignore such decorations; can that be done editorially?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading [basic.lookup.argdep] and [concept.booleantestable]/2.2, then compare the issue's reference to CWG2888. Done means agreeing on editorial wording that handles cv-qualified and reference types without changing the stated intent.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100