'voidify' is not indexed
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
It's defined and used in [specialized.algorithms] but not in any index.
The similar exposition-only function decay-copy is in the Index of Library Names, although I'm not sure if that's a good idea (most things in that index are reserved by the implementation, so cannot be used as macros by users, but that isn't true of voidify.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the [specialized.algorithms] section and compare how the exposition-only function decay-copy is handled in the Index of Library Names. Locate the draft source for these entries, determine the appropriate index treatment for voidify, and verify that the resulting index includes it correctly.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp, tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100