Problems with the wording for P1135R6 added in #3093
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
lwg
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
- The wording added to [thread.barrier.class]p1 says "the completion step is run on one of the threads that arrived at the barrier during the phase". What are we actually saying here?
- The wording added to [thread.barrier.class]p1 says "The expected count is decremented ..." - what's the "expected count"?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review issue #3093 and the [thread.barrier.class]p1 wording in the draft; first compare the added sentences with P1135R6. Determine what “completion step” and “expected count” refer to, then revise the wording so both terms are explicit and verify the section remains consistent.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100