review [iterator.concepts] for proper use of \itemdescr
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
Whether all, some, or none of the description of a concept is indented by \itemdescr seems to vary pretty randomly throughout [iterator.concepts].
We should also consider whether we want a Modeled: element to describe the circumstances under which the concept is modeled.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the [iterator.concepts] section in the draft source and review every use of \itemdescr for consistent indentation. Compare the surrounding concept descriptions, then decide whether a Modeled: element is needed and document the chosen treatment. Done means the section follows one consistent convention and the Modeled question has a clear resolution.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100