[dcl.dcl] nodeclspec-function-declaration should probably allow trailing requires-clause
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
cwg
not-editorial
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 221
- Forks
- 813
- Avg merge
- 16h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
Currently the grammar for nodeclspec-function-declaration is:
nodeclspec-function-declaration: attribute-specifier-seqopt declarator ;
This does not allow a requires-clause after declarator. This appears like an oversight when merging Concepts TS to C++20.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Search the draft source for the nodeclspec-function-declaration production named in the issue, then inspect nearby requires-clause grammar for the intended placement. Update the production so the trailing clause is represented and verify that the draft still builds with the revised grammar.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100